NOMAP and Nepiophilia: Difference between pages

From MAP Wiki
(Difference between pages)
mNo edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Nomap''' is an abbreviation that means "non offending minor attracted person". It denotes a map who did not commit a sexual offense against a child, in a very broad understanding of an offense.</br>
[[File:Nepio flag.png|thumb|right|The nepiophile flag]]
'''Nepiophilia''' is an attraction to newborns, infants and toddlers under five years of age. Sometimes it is defined only as an attraction to toddlers, with '''infantophilia''' being a separate term for an attraction towards even younger ages. Sometimes these terms are seen as synonymous.


Used to combat the stereotypes that linked minor attraction to [[Child sexual abuse|CSA]], it was especially popular with the maps of Tumblr.
== History of the term ==
The term consists of the Greek "νήπιος" (népios) meaning "infant" or "child," which derives from "ne" and "epos" meaning "not speaking." This is worth clarifying, as it is no less common for the variation of the origin of the term from an another Greek root "νέπους" or "νέποδες" meaning "children," or Latin "nepos," "nepotis" meaning "nephew" or "grandson," which does not explain the letter i in "nepio." And φιλία (philía) in turn means "love."
== Symbols ==
The nepiophile flag (pictured above) was designed by Pappy in March 2022. They also made a nepio caterpillar in 2020, taking inspiration from the [[childlove]] butterfly.
<gallery>
File:Nepio caterpillar.png|The nepio caterpillar
</gallery>


== Controversy of usage ==
== Misconceptions ==
The nomap identity first had a brief surge of popularity and then started going out of use by the end of 2010s.
Empirical studies show that in the vast majority of cases nepiophilia does not overlap with [[Pedophilia|pedophilia]] and that among pedophiles the attraction to children of the nepiophile age group occurs in less than 10% of cases<ref>Bernard, Frits. (1985). [https://www.ipce.info/booksreborn/bernard/factual.htm#IV ''Paedophilia: A factual report'']. Enclave.</ref>, so the identification of nepiophilia and pedophilia or calling the former a sub-type of the latter is fundamentally wrong. In fact, nepiophilia is much less common than [[Hebephilia|hebephilia]] and [[Ephebophilia|ephebophilia]], making it the least common of the minor attractions. Due to that non-prevalence, there is much less publicly available information on it than on any other chronophilia. Although according to Howells (1981)<ref>Howells, Kevin. (1981). Considerations Relevant to Theories of Etiology. In Mark Cook and Kevin Howells (Eds.), ''Adult Sexual Interest in Children''. London: Academic Press.</ref>, Bernard (1982)<ref>Bernard, Frits. (1982). Pädophilie und Altersgrenzen ("Paedophilia and Different Ages of Childhood"). In ''Kinderschänder?—Pädophilie: Von der Liebe mit Kindern'' (''Child Molesters?—Paedophilia: On Childlove''), 81-109. Berlin: Foerster Verlag.</ref>, McConaghy (1993)<ref>McConaghy, Nathaniel. (1993). ''Sexual Behaviour: Problems and Management'', 312. New York: Plenum. Retrieved from [https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=BC4ECC209362DAFE5DD2DEF827628A15 Library Genesis].</ref>, and Lautmann (1994)<ref>Lautmann, Rüdiger. (1994). Unterschiede zwischen Knaben- und Mädchenliebe ("Differences Between Boy- and Girl-Love"). In ''Die Lust am Kind. Portrait des Pädophilen'' (''Erotic Affection for Minors: Portrait of Paedophilia''), 36-40. Hamburg: Ingrid Klein Verlag. Retrieved from the [https://archive.org/details/dielustamkindpor0000laut Internet Archive].</ref>, male-oriented pedophilia more prevalently blends in with ephebophilia, while female-oriented pedophilia more prevalently blends in with nepiophilia.
== Infantophilia ==
According to most researchers, the word "infantophilia" in its modern interpretation was first mentioned in ''Infantophilia—A New Subcategory of Pedophilia?: A Preliminary Study'' by David Greenberg<ref>Greenberg, David M.; Bradford, John; Curry, Susan. (1995). [https://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/23/1/63.full.pdf Infantophilia—A New Subcategory of Pedophilia?: A Preliminary Study]. ''Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law'', Vol. 23, No. 1.</ref>, described there as "a sexual orientation for children less than five years old." This was later elaborated upon in ''A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues''<ref>Hall, Ryan C. W. and Hall, Richard C. W. (2007). [https://archive.org/details/sim_mayo-clinic-proceedings_2007-04_82_4/page/457 A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues]. ''Mayo Clinic Proceedings'', Vol. 82, No. 4.</ref>. Previously it was interpreted along with the term nepiophilia by John Money as: "If the eligible partner is an infant, 'infantophilia' is the diagnostic term. If it is essential that the infant be wearing diapers, however, the Greek-derived term for the diapered infant, 'nepiophilia,' applies"<ref>Money, John. (1990). Pedophilia, New Phylism Theory, and Paraphilic Lovemaps. In Jay Feierman (Ed.), ''Pedophilia, Biosocial Dimensions'', 451. Springer. Retrieved from [https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=3CA15750CD7EC06C3052B55B5E16C76D Library Genesis].</ref>. However, this interpretation was later rejected because of the vagueness of the origin of such a peculiar and unconfirmed definition. Greenberg, on the other hand, is an exceptionally reliable source, as he studied actual maps rather than relying on theoretical assumptions.


=== Legalism accusations ===
== References ==
While "offense" is a legal term with different definitions in local laws, for a long time the word "nomap" was divorced from its legal implications. The Tumblr map community, which consisted largely of young people and those for who English was a second language, understood it as "someone who hasn't harmed children", as opposed to "someone who hasn't broken a law". Receiving more information about what an offense is and how it may vary from country to country was one of the reasons the word fell out of favor.</br>
 
However, a cultural clash with non-Tumblr maps (especially [[pro-contact]] Twitter bloggers) has resulted in a rumor that Tumblr anti-contacts value legality above ethics and support police. The [[MAP flag|map flag]], called "the nomap flag" by its maker, is a frequent target of such slander.
 
=== Undesirable outcomes ===
* An unwanted dichotomy "maps and nomaps" entered the discourse. Since there wasn’t any word to denote an offending map, some people assumed "map" meant an offender.
* There was never a clear definition of what an offense is. Defining it through legal terms would lead to identical acts being classified differently, depending on where the person lives. Some American maps' insistence on using their laws as a universal measure has exposed a problem of national supremacy in the map community.
* There did not exist a place for rehabilitated ex offenders. Including people who have committed CSA in the past as nomaps was counterintuitive to the purpose of the label, and alienating them contradicted the goals of rehabilitation.
 
Possibly one of the strongest arguments against this word’s usage is that it creates an artificial division of violent acts into "sexual abuse of a child" and "everything else". However, some people still find the term useful, and in 2019 a figure known as Rainbow made up a word "acnomap", attaching [[anti-contact]] views to the old label.
 
[[Category:Terminology]]
[[Category:Original pages]]
[[Category:Original pages]]

Revision as of 00:07, 5 May 2024

The nepiophile flag

Nepiophilia is an attraction to newborns, infants and toddlers under five years of age. Sometimes it is defined only as an attraction to toddlers, with infantophilia being a separate term for an attraction towards even younger ages. Sometimes these terms are seen as synonymous.

History of the term

The term consists of the Greek "νήπιος" (népios) meaning "infant" or "child," which derives from "ne" and "epos" meaning "not speaking." This is worth clarifying, as it is no less common for the variation of the origin of the term from an another Greek root "νέπους" or "νέποδες" meaning "children," or Latin "nepos," "nepotis" meaning "nephew" or "grandson," which does not explain the letter i in "nepio." And φιλία (philía) in turn means "love."

Symbols

The nepiophile flag (pictured above) was designed by Pappy in March 2022. They also made a nepio caterpillar in 2020, taking inspiration from the childlove butterfly.

Misconceptions

Empirical studies show that in the vast majority of cases nepiophilia does not overlap with pedophilia and that among pedophiles the attraction to children of the nepiophile age group occurs in less than 10% of cases[1], so the identification of nepiophilia and pedophilia or calling the former a sub-type of the latter is fundamentally wrong. In fact, nepiophilia is much less common than hebephilia and ephebophilia, making it the least common of the minor attractions. Due to that non-prevalence, there is much less publicly available information on it than on any other chronophilia. Although according to Howells (1981)[2], Bernard (1982)[3], McConaghy (1993)[4], and Lautmann (1994)[5], male-oriented pedophilia more prevalently blends in with ephebophilia, while female-oriented pedophilia more prevalently blends in with nepiophilia.

Infantophilia

According to most researchers, the word "infantophilia" in its modern interpretation was first mentioned in Infantophilia—A New Subcategory of Pedophilia?: A Preliminary Study by David Greenberg[6], described there as "a sexual orientation for children less than five years old." This was later elaborated upon in A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues[7]. Previously it was interpreted along with the term nepiophilia by John Money as: "If the eligible partner is an infant, 'infantophilia' is the diagnostic term. If it is essential that the infant be wearing diapers, however, the Greek-derived term for the diapered infant, 'nepiophilia,' applies"[8]. However, this interpretation was later rejected because of the vagueness of the origin of such a peculiar and unconfirmed definition. Greenberg, on the other hand, is an exceptionally reliable source, as he studied actual maps rather than relying on theoretical assumptions.

References

  1. Bernard, Frits. (1985). Paedophilia: A factual report. Enclave.
  2. Howells, Kevin. (1981). Considerations Relevant to Theories of Etiology. In Mark Cook and Kevin Howells (Eds.), Adult Sexual Interest in Children. London: Academic Press.
  3. Bernard, Frits. (1982). Pädophilie und Altersgrenzen ("Paedophilia and Different Ages of Childhood"). In Kinderschänder?—Pädophilie: Von der Liebe mit Kindern (Child Molesters?—Paedophilia: On Childlove), 81-109. Berlin: Foerster Verlag.
  4. McConaghy, Nathaniel. (1993). Sexual Behaviour: Problems and Management, 312. New York: Plenum. Retrieved from Library Genesis.
  5. Lautmann, Rüdiger. (1994). Unterschiede zwischen Knaben- und Mädchenliebe ("Differences Between Boy- and Girl-Love"). In Die Lust am Kind. Portrait des Pädophilen (Erotic Affection for Minors: Portrait of Paedophilia), 36-40. Hamburg: Ingrid Klein Verlag. Retrieved from the Internet Archive.
  6. Greenberg, David M.; Bradford, John; Curry, Susan. (1995). Infantophilia—A New Subcategory of Pedophilia?: A Preliminary Study. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, Vol. 23, No. 1.
  7. Hall, Ryan C. W. and Hall, Richard C. W. (2007). A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 82, No. 4.
  8. Money, John. (1990). Pedophilia, New Phylism Theory, and Paraphilic Lovemaps. In Jay Feierman (Ed.), Pedophilia, Biosocial Dimensions, 451. Springer. Retrieved from Library Genesis.